<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 340 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245869</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 221(1) of the IT Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The assessee, engaged in construction business, faced financial hardships due to market conditions, leading to delayed tax payment. The ITAT found the assessee&#039;s reasons for non-compliance genuine, emphasizing the discretionary nature of penalty imposition. As the tax liability and interest were eventually paid, the ITAT affirmed the deletion of the penalty, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 340 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245869</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 221(1) of the IT Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The assessee, engaged in construction business, faced financial hardships due to market conditions, leading to delayed tax payment. The ITAT found the assessee&#039;s reasons for non-compliance genuine, emphasizing the discretionary nature of penalty imposition. As the tax liability and interest were eventually paid, the ITAT affirmed the deletion of the penalty, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>