https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245865 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that duty should be paid on the FOR price, including freight charges, as sales were on a FOR basis. The Tribunal found that Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 was wrongly invoked by the department, and the appellant correctly paid duty. Additionally, the exemption availed under notification no.56/2002-CE was deemed valid as the appellant had paid duty in accordance with the notification. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and stay application, setting aside the impugned order. en-us Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245865 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that duty should be paid on the FOR price, including freight charges, as sales were on a FOR basis. The Tribunal found that Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 was wrongly invoked by the department, and the appellant correctly paid duty. Additionally, the exemption availed under notification no.56/2002-CE was deemed valid as the appellant had paid duty in accordance with the notification. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and stay application, setting aside the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245865