<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 330 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245859</link>
    <description>The judgment confirms the demand against the appellant for including pre-delivery inspection charges and after-sale charges in the assessable value of cars sold. The subsequent stay petition considered the Larger Bench decision and granted an unconditional stay to the appellant, dispensing with the pre-deposit condition. The judgment references the Bombay High Court decision invalidating the inclusion of such charges in the assessable value. The appellant&#039;s stay petition is allowed without requiring a pre-deposit of dues, and the case is consolidated with an earlier appeal pending a decision from the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:07:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 330 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245859</link>
      <description>The judgment confirms the demand against the appellant for including pre-delivery inspection charges and after-sale charges in the assessable value of cars sold. The subsequent stay petition considered the Larger Bench decision and granted an unconditional stay to the appellant, dispensing with the pre-deposit condition. The judgment references the Bombay High Court decision invalidating the inclusion of such charges in the assessable value. The appellant&#039;s stay petition is allowed without requiring a pre-deposit of dues, and the case is consolidated with an earlier appeal pending a decision from the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>