<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 612 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163806</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a city booking agency, in a case concerning the validity of a notice issued by the Trade Tax Department. The notice requested further details about consignees of goods released by the petitioner, citing discrepancies in consignees&#039; actual locations. The court found that the petitioner had complied by providing consignees&#039; addresses as per goods receipts and highlighted the normal procedures followed by the railways and city booking agencies in delivering goods. The judgment emphasized the lack of substantial evidence supporting foul play by the petitioner and ultimately quashed the impugned notice, suggesting enhanced checks by the Trade Tax Department for future prevention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 18:37:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 612 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163806</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a city booking agency, in a case concerning the validity of a notice issued by the Trade Tax Department. The notice requested further details about consignees of goods released by the petitioner, citing discrepancies in consignees&#039; actual locations. The court found that the petitioner had complied by providing consignees&#039; addresses as per goods receipts and highlighted the normal procedures followed by the railways and city booking agencies in delivering goods. The judgment emphasized the lack of substantial evidence supporting foul play by the petitioner and ultimately quashed the impugned notice, suggesting enhanced checks by the Trade Tax Department for future prevention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>