<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 589 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163798</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was upheld where the assessee was given notice and repeated opportunities to produce books and supporting records, but failed to furnish the basic material needed for verification. The Court held that, in those circumstances, the assessee could not insist on summons, cross-check references, or affidavits from sellers to prove tax sufferance on purchases. It further found that the assessing officer had substantially complied with the appellate remand directions to recheck accounts, correlate transactions with records, and afford a hearing. The writ petitions challenging the reassessment orders were therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 589 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163798</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was upheld where the assessee was given notice and repeated opportunities to produce books and supporting records, but failed to furnish the basic material needed for verification. The Court held that, in those circumstances, the assessee could not insist on summons, cross-check references, or affidavits from sellers to prove tax sufferance on purchases. It further found that the assessing officer had substantially complied with the appellate remand directions to recheck accounts, correlate transactions with records, and afford a hearing. The writ petitions challenging the reassessment orders were therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>