<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 610 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163788</link>
    <description>A reassessment order cannot be sustained where the assessee&#039;s objections and supporting documents are not considered and a requested personal hearing is denied, because tax proceedings carrying adverse civil consequences must comply with natural justice. The Madras High Court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Department for fresh consideration after affording personal hearing and an opportunity to produce documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 610 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163788</link>
      <description>A reassessment order cannot be sustained where the assessee&#039;s objections and supporting documents are not considered and a requested personal hearing is denied, because tax proceedings carrying adverse civil consequences must comply with natural justice. The Madras High Court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Department for fresh consideration after affording personal hearing and an opportunity to produce documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>