<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 588 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163760</link>
    <description>A registration certificate under the West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003 cannot be cancelled under section 29(1)(c) merely because the declared premises are residential or do not contain a separate godown or office room, where the statutory definition of &quot;place of business&quot; is otherwise satisfied. Absence of books of account at inspection, without more, does not by itself prove a false representation for registration. Where the cancellation fails, a seizure of goods founded on the alleged non-existence of the dealer at the declared premises also fails. A penalty imposed solely on that same basis cannot survive independently and is liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 22:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 588 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163760</link>
      <description>A registration certificate under the West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003 cannot be cancelled under section 29(1)(c) merely because the declared premises are residential or do not contain a separate godown or office room, where the statutory definition of &quot;place of business&quot; is otherwise satisfied. Absence of books of account at inspection, without more, does not by itself prove a false representation for registration. Where the cancellation fails, a seizure of goods founded on the alleged non-existence of the dealer at the declared premises also fails. A penalty imposed solely on that same basis cannot survive independently and is liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>