<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 326 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit 50% of the confirmed service tax amount within eight weeks, with a waiver of pre-deposit for the remaining dues until the appeal hearing, emphasizing compliance reporting by a specified date. The Tribunal found that the services provided, including promotion and marketing activities in India, did not entirely qualify as used outside India, impacting the export of service classification. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalty was not entirely waived based on the nature of services provided to a foreign firm, as certain activities were performed in India, leading to the decision for partial deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 326 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit 50% of the confirmed service tax amount within eight weeks, with a waiver of pre-deposit for the remaining dues until the appeal hearing, emphasizing compliance reporting by a specified date. The Tribunal found that the services provided, including promotion and marketing activities in India, did not entirely qualify as used outside India, impacting the export of service classification. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalty was not entirely waived based on the nature of services provided to a foreign firm, as certain activities were performed in India, leading to the decision for partial deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>