<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 314 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245843</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, finding no error in law or facts. Payments below Rs.20,000 for freight charges were not subject to TDS deduction as per CBDT circulars. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal rejected claims of additional evidence admission against Rule 46A. The judgment was pronounced on March 28, 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 314 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245843</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, finding no error in law or facts. Payments below Rs.20,000 for freight charges were not subject to TDS deduction as per CBDT circulars. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal rejected claims of additional evidence admission against Rule 46A. The judgment was pronounced on March 28, 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>