<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 642 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163741</link>
    <description>Sales tax exemption under section 39 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 depended on carrying on a manufacturing activity within section 2(17). Once the statutory definition was amended to omit blending of tea from &quot;manufacture,&quot; tea blending no longer satisfied the condition for continued exemption. The eligibility certificate created only an existing statutory benefit, not a vested right immune from legislative change, so the exemption could be prospectively withdrawn by amendment. Authorities based on promissory estoppel and subordinate legislation were distinguished. The constitutional challenge was not examined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:36:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 642 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163741</link>
      <description>Sales tax exemption under section 39 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 depended on carrying on a manufacturing activity within section 2(17). Once the statutory definition was amended to omit blending of tea from &quot;manufacture,&quot; tea blending no longer satisfied the condition for continued exemption. The eligibility certificate created only an existing statutory benefit, not a vested right immune from legislative change, so the exemption could be prospectively withdrawn by amendment. Authorities based on promissory estoppel and subordinate legislation were distinguished. The constitutional challenge was not examined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>