<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 575 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163740</link>
    <description>Tea sold through an auctioneer was treated as subject to turnover tax as a second sale under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 read with the relevant notification. The stated reasoning was that the tea planters had only entrusted the goods to the auctioneer for sale, so there was no prior sale between the owner and the auctioneer; on that basis, the auctioneer&#039;s sale was the first sale, and the purchaser&#039;s onward sale was the second sale for tax purposes. The challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s view was therefore said to fail, and the levy of turnover tax on the petitioner&#039;s tea sales was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:33:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 575 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163740</link>
      <description>Tea sold through an auctioneer was treated as subject to turnover tax as a second sale under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 read with the relevant notification. The stated reasoning was that the tea planters had only entrusted the goods to the auctioneer for sale, so there was no prior sale between the owner and the auctioneer; on that basis, the auctioneer&#039;s sale was the first sale, and the purchaser&#039;s onward sale was the second sale for tax purposes. The challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s view was therefore said to fail, and the levy of turnover tax on the petitioner&#039;s tea sales was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>