<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 695 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163733</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC upheld a Tribunal remand for transaction-wise scrutiny under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, holding that the assessing authority had not examined each purchase individually before rejecting the claim. The Tribunal was entitled to require reconsideration where the nature of the purchases depended on the legal test for inter-State transactions and purchases made by a commission agent for an ex-U.P. principal. Such purchases qualify as inter-State only when made on the principal&#039;s instruction, in pursuance of that instruction, and when the subsequent dispatches can be clearly linked to those purchases. The remand was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:10:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 695 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163733</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC upheld a Tribunal remand for transaction-wise scrutiny under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, holding that the assessing authority had not examined each purchase individually before rejecting the claim. The Tribunal was entitled to require reconsideration where the nature of the purchases depended on the legal test for inter-State transactions and purchases made by a commission agent for an ex-U.P. principal. Such purchases qualify as inter-State only when made on the principal&#039;s instruction, in pursuance of that instruction, and when the subsequent dispatches can be clearly linked to those purchases. The remand was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>