<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 294 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245823</link>
    <description>Industrial cables were held classifiable under Entry 40 of Schedule III of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 because the entry expressly covered industrial cables and did not incorporate any HSN or Central Excise Tariff reference. The statute showed that tariff nomenclature governed classification only where the Legislature said so expressly, and circulars could not narrow the statutory language or substitute for it. In the absence of such incorporation, classification had to follow common parlance and commercial understanding. On the facts, the goods were industrial cables of 1100 volts, consistent with that description, so the residuary entry did not apply and the question of law was answered for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 294 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245823</link>
      <description>Industrial cables were held classifiable under Entry 40 of Schedule III of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 because the entry expressly covered industrial cables and did not incorporate any HSN or Central Excise Tariff reference. The statute showed that tariff nomenclature governed classification only where the Legislature said so expressly, and circulars could not narrow the statutory language or substitute for it. In the absence of such incorporation, classification had to follow common parlance and commercial understanding. On the facts, the goods were industrial cables of 1100 volts, consistent with that description, so the residuary entry did not apply and the question of law was answered for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>