<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 666 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163702</link>
    <description>An exemption notification for institutions certified by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission or Board was construed according to its plain wording. Because earlier notifications had expressly used product-wise language where that result was intended, the later notification was read as granting exemption to the institution&#039;s manufactured turnover in the assessment year up to the stated monetary limit, not separately to each manufactured product. The Court therefore rejected an expanded reading of the exemption beyond the text and held that the Tribunal&#039;s contrary interpretation could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 666 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163702</link>
      <description>An exemption notification for institutions certified by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission or Board was construed according to its plain wording. Because earlier notifications had expressly used product-wise language where that result was intended, the later notification was read as granting exemption to the institution&#039;s manufactured turnover in the assessment year up to the stated monetary limit, not separately to each manufactured product. The Court therefore rejected an expanded reading of the exemption beyond the text and held that the Tribunal&#039;s contrary interpretation could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>