https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163697 A rejection of a claim under G.O. Ms. No. 43 was set aside because it was a non-speaking order that gave no reasons. The Court held that an order rejecting a claim must disclose reasons to withstand judicial scrutiny, and the consequential demand notices could not survive once the foundation order failed. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the applicability of G.O. Ms. No. 43 to the case, while leaving it open to the assessing officer to proceed in accordance with the statutory provisions for the relevant assessment years. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:24:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163697 A rejection of a claim under G.O. Ms. No. 43 was set aside because it was a non-speaking order that gave no reasons. The Court held that an order rejecting a claim must disclose reasons to withstand judicial scrutiny, and the consequential demand notices could not survive once the foundation order failed. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the applicability of G.O. Ms. No. 43 to the case, while leaving it open to the assessing officer to proceed in accordance with the statutory provisions for the relevant assessment years. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163697