<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 597 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163696</link>
    <description>A residuary entry under a trade tax notification cannot be applied without first determining whether the goods fall within a specific enumerated category; the Tribunal had to reconsider whether the goods were &quot;passive components&quot; under clause (i) before treating them as &quot;all other electronic goods&quot; under clause (iii). The Tribunal also had to examine the effect of the concessional Central Sales Tax notification granting a two per cent rate on inter-State sales of electronic goods, including whether the availability of forms C or D affected that concession. The order was set aside and the matters were remitted for fresh adjudication on classification and concessional rate applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 597 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163696</link>
      <description>A residuary entry under a trade tax notification cannot be applied without first determining whether the goods fall within a specific enumerated category; the Tribunal had to reconsider whether the goods were &quot;passive components&quot; under clause (i) before treating them as &quot;all other electronic goods&quot; under clause (iii). The Tribunal also had to examine the effect of the concessional Central Sales Tax notification granting a two per cent rate on inter-State sales of electronic goods, including whether the availability of forms C or D affected that concession. The order was set aside and the matters were remitted for fresh adjudication on classification and concessional rate applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>