<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 281 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245810</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Appellate Tribunal and Assessment Order, remitting the matter for fresh consideration. The Assessing Officer must allow the appellant to present evidence supporting the treatment of the amount as a business loss, emphasizing the necessity for proper documentation and reflection in the accounts. The decision partially allowed the appeal, requiring reassessment based on these criteria.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:29:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 281 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245810</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Appellate Tribunal and Assessment Order, remitting the matter for fresh consideration. The Assessing Officer must allow the appellant to present evidence supporting the treatment of the amount as a business loss, emphasizing the necessity for proper documentation and reflection in the accounts. The decision partially allowed the appeal, requiring reassessment based on these criteria.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>