<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 280 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245809</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment, as it was based on a change of opinion, which is impermissible. The Assessing Officer had already considered and accepted the income as capital gain during the original assessment. The court concluded that the reasons for reopening the assessment were not justified, and the petition was allowed, leading to the quashing of the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 280 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245809</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment, as it was based on a change of opinion, which is impermissible. The Assessing Officer had already considered and accepted the income as capital gain during the original assessment. The court concluded that the reasons for reopening the assessment were not justified, and the petition was allowed, leading to the quashing of the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>