<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 258 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245787</link>
    <description>A small scale industrial unit eligible for an exemption notification was also entitled to choose MODVAT credit on inputs under Rule 57A instead of availing the exemption. Rule 57C denied input credit only where the final product was wholly exempt or chargeable to nil duty, but the exemption notification and the MODVAT scheme were both beneficial and operated as alternatives. A manufacturer covered by both could elect the more beneficial course, and the exemption could not be imposed so as to deny MODVAT credit when the assessee chose not to avail the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 258 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245787</link>
      <description>A small scale industrial unit eligible for an exemption notification was also entitled to choose MODVAT credit on inputs under Rule 57A instead of availing the exemption. Rule 57C denied input credit only where the final product was wholly exempt or chargeable to nil duty, but the exemption notification and the MODVAT scheme were both beneficial and operated as alternatives. A manufacturer covered by both could elect the more beneficial course, and the exemption could not be imposed so as to deny MODVAT credit when the assessee chose not to avail the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>