<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1105 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the process of converting rejected BOPP films into scrap and granules amounted to manufacturing. The duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellant were found to be unjustified, as the waste and scrap generated did not arise from a manufacturing process. The Tribunal provided a thorough analysis, referencing legal precedents to support its decision and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 09:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1105 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the process of converting rejected BOPP films into scrap and granules amounted to manufacturing. The duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellant were found to be unjustified, as the waste and scrap generated did not arise from a manufacturing process. The Tribunal provided a thorough analysis, referencing legal precedents to support its decision and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>