<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 570 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163690</link>
    <description>Where a statute permits reduction of cinema seating capacity subject to prior approval of a superior authority, the initial request must be made to the licensing authority that granted the licence and fixed the capacity. The superior authority&#039;s approval operates at a later stage if the licensing authority is otherwise inclined to allow the reduction. Earlier enhancement of seating capacity at the licensee&#039;s request does not create a statutory bar to a later reduction application, and anticipated loss of revenue is not, by itself, a valid ground to refuse the statutory remedy. The rejection was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration by the licensing authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:39:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 570 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163690</link>
      <description>Where a statute permits reduction of cinema seating capacity subject to prior approval of a superior authority, the initial request must be made to the licensing authority that granted the licence and fixed the capacity. The superior authority&#039;s approval operates at a later stage if the licensing authority is otherwise inclined to allow the reduction. Earlier enhancement of seating capacity at the licensee&#039;s request does not create a statutory bar to a later reduction application, and anticipated loss of revenue is not, by itself, a valid ground to refuse the statutory remedy. The rejection was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration by the licensing authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>