<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 530 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163669</link>
    <description>Wood-wool obtained by grinding timber or wood was treated as a product of timber within the broad meaning of that term in the relevant notification. The court reasoned that &quot;product&quot; covers anything produced or obtained from timber or wood through processing, physical action, or other work, and is not confined to items that occur naturally. On that basis, wood-wool fell within the concessional tax entry at 6% and was not taxable as an unclassified item at 8%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 530 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163669</link>
      <description>Wood-wool obtained by grinding timber or wood was treated as a product of timber within the broad meaning of that term in the relevant notification. The court reasoned that &quot;product&quot; covers anything produced or obtained from timber or wood through processing, physical action, or other work, and is not confined to items that occur naturally. On that basis, wood-wool fell within the concessional tax entry at 6% and was not taxable as an unclassified item at 8%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>