<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 574 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163656</link>
    <description>Section 7(12) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act applies only to excess tax situations arising within the specific purchase-tax adjustment scheme under section 7A(1) and cannot be extended to a contractor who paid compounded tax under section 7(7) while tax was separately deducted at source under section 7(7B). In that setting, excess tax remitted cannot be forfeited under section 7(12); it must first be adjusted against surcharge payable, and only any remaining balance is refundable. The text states that an assessment treating the excess as forfeited was beyond jurisdiction and that consequential refund follows after surcharge adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 574 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163656</link>
      <description>Section 7(12) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act applies only to excess tax situations arising within the specific purchase-tax adjustment scheme under section 7A(1) and cannot be extended to a contractor who paid compounded tax under section 7(7) while tax was separately deducted at source under section 7(7B). In that setting, excess tax remitted cannot be forfeited under section 7(12); it must first be adjusted against surcharge payable, and only any remaining balance is refundable. The text states that an assessment treating the excess as forfeited was beyond jurisdiction and that consequential refund follows after surcharge adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>