<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 594 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163652</link>
    <description>Turnover enhancement for alleged suppression must have a reasonable nexus with the materials actually detected, and it cannot extend beyond the suppression proved on record. Here, unaccounted purchase of tyres did not establish any link to sales suppression, so the enhancement had to be confined to the detected unaccounted sales and the original figure was reduced. Penalty under section 12(8) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 is discretionary and cannot be imposed mechanically; it must rest on relevant facts and judicially exercised discretion. The penalty was therefore sustained only to the extent linked to the revised tax liability on the reduced enhancement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 594 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163652</link>
      <description>Turnover enhancement for alleged suppression must have a reasonable nexus with the materials actually detected, and it cannot extend beyond the suppression proved on record. Here, unaccounted purchase of tyres did not establish any link to sales suppression, so the enhancement had to be confined to the detected unaccounted sales and the original figure was reduced. Penalty under section 12(8) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 is discretionary and cannot be imposed mechanically; it must rest on relevant facts and judicially exercised discretion. The penalty was therefore sustained only to the extent linked to the revised tax liability on the reduced enhancement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>