<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 249 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245778</link>
    <description>The payments made for consultancy services were not classified as Fees for Technical Services under the India-Netherlands Tax Treaty. As there was no Permanent Establishment in India, the payments were not considered taxable business income in India. Consequently, withholding tax under section 195 of the Income-tax Act did not apply. The transaction was deemed legitimate without evidence of tax avoidance. The ruling was issued on December 6, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 249 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245778</link>
      <description>The payments made for consultancy services were not classified as Fees for Technical Services under the India-Netherlands Tax Treaty. As there was no Permanent Establishment in India, the payments were not considered taxable business income in India. Consequently, withholding tax under section 195 of the Income-tax Act did not apply. The transaction was deemed legitimate without evidence of tax avoidance. The ruling was issued on December 6, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>