<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 246 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245775</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee firm. It held that the payment of commission to Tapasya Projects Ltd. was not subject to tax deduction under Section 194-H as the services provided were related to securities, falling outside the purview of the section. Additionally, expenses paid without deducting tax at source were not disallowed under Section 40(a)(ia) as the services were specifically related to securities. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 246 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245775</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee firm. It held that the payment of commission to Tapasya Projects Ltd. was not subject to tax deduction under Section 194-H as the services provided were related to securities, falling outside the purview of the section. Additionally, expenses paid without deducting tax at source were not disallowed under Section 40(a)(ia) as the services were specifically related to securities. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>