https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245758 A conviction for an Abkari offence was sustained even though the charge cited the wrong penal provision, because the facts clearly established the ingredients of the correct offence and no prejudice was shown to the accused. The Court treated the conviction as referable to the proper statutory provision. On sentence, the absence of any previous similar offending justified moderation, and the punishment was reduced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine, with default imprisonment for non-payment. en-us Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Apr 2014 06:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245758 A conviction for an Abkari offence was sustained even though the charge cited the wrong penal provision, because the facts clearly established the ingredients of the correct offence and no prejudice was shown to the accused. The Court treated the conviction as referable to the proper statutory provision. On sentence, the absence of any previous similar offending justified moderation, and the punishment was reduced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine, with default imprisonment for non-payment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245758