<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 873 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245753</link>
    <description>The appeal contested demands of interest and penalty under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal upheld the interest demand as duty payments were made under Section 11A(2B) but set aside the penalty based on clarificatory explanations, allowing the appellant to benefit. The Tribunal followed the view of the jurisdictional High Court, partially allowing the appeal by upholding the interest demand while setting aside the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:54:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 873 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245753</link>
      <description>The appeal contested demands of interest and penalty under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal upheld the interest demand as duty payments were made under Section 11A(2B) but set aside the penalty based on clarificatory explanations, allowing the appellant to benefit. The Tribunal followed the view of the jurisdictional High Court, partially allowing the appeal by upholding the interest demand while setting aside the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>