<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 592 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163640</link>
    <description>Turnover enhancement cannot rest on an isolated stock discrepancy where purchases of mentha oil and raw material were accepted as in order; the Tribunal was required to consider the accepted purchase record before treating the alleged 75 kg discrepancy as proof of suppressed production or taxable turnover. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration on this issue. A petty cash balance of Rs. 5,000, without cogent evidence linking it to unrecorded sales or tax evasion, could not by itself justify an adverse inference of suppression of sales; that inference also required re-examination on remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 592 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163640</link>
      <description>Turnover enhancement cannot rest on an isolated stock discrepancy where purchases of mentha oil and raw material were accepted as in order; the Tribunal was required to consider the accepted purchase record before treating the alleged 75 kg discrepancy as proof of suppressed production or taxable turnover. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration on this issue. A petty cash balance of Rs. 5,000, without cogent evidence linking it to unrecorded sales or tax evasion, could not by itself justify an adverse inference of suppression of sales; that inference also required re-examination on remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>