<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 571 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163637</link>
    <description>Section 9(3)(a)(iv) permits the first appellate authority to call for inquiry and obtain a verification report, and that power does not exclude the separate power under section 9(3)(a)(iii) to set aside an assessment and remand the matter for fresh assessment. Where the assessee had not appeared before the assessing authority or produced books of account and purchase details, and the ex parte assessments were challenged for alleged lack of service and opportunity, a remand directing fresh inquiry was within jurisdiction. A later letter from the Assistant Commissioner was treated only as a reminder that the assessee should be given an opportunity to explain the material, not as adverse reliance on undisclosed evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:24:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 571 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163637</link>
      <description>Section 9(3)(a)(iv) permits the first appellate authority to call for inquiry and obtain a verification report, and that power does not exclude the separate power under section 9(3)(a)(iii) to set aside an assessment and remand the matter for fresh assessment. Where the assessee had not appeared before the assessing authority or produced books of account and purchase details, and the ex parte assessments were challenged for alleged lack of service and opportunity, a remand directing fresh inquiry was within jurisdiction. A later letter from the Assistant Commissioner was treated only as a reminder that the assessee should be given an opportunity to explain the material, not as adverse reliance on undisclosed evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>