<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 591 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163636</link>
    <description>The concessional sales tax scheme under the Assam Industries (Sales Tax Concessions) Act, 1986 and the 1988 Rules applied only to new industrial units meeting the statutory eligibility conditions. An industrial unit that had already taken exemption under an earlier policy did not qualify as a new unit for the later concession regime. An authorisation certificate issued without satisfying those eligibility requirements could not validate an assessment founded on it, because the assessment was affected by jurisdictional error. That error was held amenable to revision under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993, so the revisional authority was competent to interfere with the assessment and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 591 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163636</link>
      <description>The concessional sales tax scheme under the Assam Industries (Sales Tax Concessions) Act, 1986 and the 1988 Rules applied only to new industrial units meeting the statutory eligibility conditions. An industrial unit that had already taken exemption under an earlier policy did not qualify as a new unit for the later concession regime. An authorisation certificate issued without satisfying those eligibility requirements could not validate an assessment founded on it, because the assessment was affected by jurisdictional error. That error was held amenable to revision under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993, so the revisional authority was competent to interfere with the assessment and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>