<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 604 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163628</link>
    <description>Supplies of medicines and stores between departments of the Central Government did not constitute sales under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954, because ownership remained with the same legal entity and no transfer of property occurred between distinct persons. Such intra-governmental transfers were therefore not taxable, and the supplier was not a dealer for those transactions. Supplies to State Governments, statutory bodies or other separate recipients constituted sales where property passed to distinct entities and remained taxable. Free distribution of aid goods fell outside the taxing provision. Article 285(1) did not exempt the transactions because sales tax attaches to the act of sale rather than ownership of goods. Taxable turnover required fresh determination after segregating taxable and non-taxable supplies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:18:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 604 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163628</link>
      <description>Supplies of medicines and stores between departments of the Central Government did not constitute sales under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954, because ownership remained with the same legal entity and no transfer of property occurred between distinct persons. Such intra-governmental transfers were therefore not taxable, and the supplier was not a dealer for those transactions. Supplies to State Governments, statutory bodies or other separate recipients constituted sales where property passed to distinct entities and remained taxable. Free distribution of aid goods fell outside the taxing provision. Article 285(1) did not exempt the transactions because sales tax attaches to the act of sale rather than ownership of goods. Taxable turnover required fresh determination after segregating taxable and non-taxable supplies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>