<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 587 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163614</link>
    <description>A concessional sales tax notification limited to goods purchased for a department&#039;s &quot;official use&quot; was held not to cover lottery tickets acquired for conducting a revenue-generating lottery activity. The Court reasoned that the decisive test was the actual purpose of the goods, not merely the departmental declaration stating official use. Because the tickets were printed for a commercial venture and not for ordinary office requirements, the expression &quot;used by them&quot; and the declaration &quot;for official use&quot; could not be extended to the purchase. The assessee was therefore not entitled to the reduced rate of tax, and assessment at the regular rate was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 587 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163614</link>
      <description>A concessional sales tax notification limited to goods purchased for a department&#039;s &quot;official use&quot; was held not to cover lottery tickets acquired for conducting a revenue-generating lottery activity. The Court reasoned that the decisive test was the actual purpose of the goods, not merely the departmental declaration stating official use. Because the tickets were printed for a commercial venture and not for ordinary office requirements, the expression &quot;used by them&quot; and the declaration &quot;for official use&quot; could not be extended to the purchase. The assessee was therefore not entitled to the reduced rate of tax, and assessment at the regular rate was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>