<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 611 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163606</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, stating that recovery of trade tax dues from the personal assets of directors is not permissible unless there is evidence of fraudulent transfer of funds or personal guarantee. The court emphasized that directors&#039; liability is limited by shares under the Companies Act and restrained the respondents from pursuing such recovery. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 611 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163606</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, stating that recovery of trade tax dues from the personal assets of directors is not permissible unless there is evidence of fraudulent transfer of funds or personal guarantee. The court emphasized that directors&#039; liability is limited by shares under the Companies Act and restrained the respondents from pursuing such recovery. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>