<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 646 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163591</link>
    <description>Where an exemption notification uses plain and unambiguous language to cap eligibility by turnover, the prescribed limit applies to the assessee&#039;s entire turnover unless the notification itself excludes exempt sales. The Allahabad HC held that turnover not liable to tax under other provisions could not be excluded from the computation, because the clause made no distinction between taxable and non-taxable turnover. The factual inability to maintain separate accounts also supported treating turnover as indivisible on the facts. The Tribunal&#039;s view was therefore not disturbed and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:35:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 646 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163591</link>
      <description>Where an exemption notification uses plain and unambiguous language to cap eligibility by turnover, the prescribed limit applies to the assessee&#039;s entire turnover unless the notification itself excludes exempt sales. The Allahabad HC held that turnover not liable to tax under other provisions could not be excluded from the computation, because the clause made no distinction between taxable and non-taxable turnover. The factual inability to maintain separate accounts also supported treating turnover as indivisible on the facts. The Tribunal&#039;s view was therefore not disturbed and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>