<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 871 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245751</link>
    <description>The court set aside the decision to confiscate raw materials found in an adjoining godown during a factory visit and imposed penalties on the appellants. The court ruled that the confiscation and penalties were unjustified as the goods had not reached the factory premises and were not used for duty evasion. The orders were based on unfounded assumptions and lacked legal basis, leading to the appeals being allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:45:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 871 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245751</link>
      <description>The court set aside the decision to confiscate raw materials found in an adjoining godown during a factory visit and imposed penalties on the appellants. The court ruled that the confiscation and penalties were unjustified as the goods had not reached the factory premises and were not used for duty evasion. The orders were based on unfounded assumptions and lacked legal basis, leading to the appeals being allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>