https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245750 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the demand, interest, and penalty confirmed against the assessees due to the failure to implement a remand order for cross-examination of a crucial witness. The Tribunal emphasized that the non-implementation of the remand order violated principles of natural justice, leading to the rejection of the appeal against the order and affirming the decision to set aside the demand, interest, and penalty. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:43:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245750 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the demand, interest, and penalty confirmed against the assessees due to the failure to implement a remand order for cross-examination of a crucial witness. The Tribunal emphasized that the non-implementation of the remand order violated principles of natural justice, leading to the rejection of the appeal against the order and affirming the decision to set aside the demand, interest, and penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245750