<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 866 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, annulling the penalty imposition due to the absence of proven suppression of facts or intent to evade duty. The duty demand and interest were upheld as valid, as the appellant did not contest them. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing suppression of facts for penalty imposition under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 866 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, annulling the penalty imposition due to the absence of proven suppression of facts or intent to evade duty. The duty demand and interest were upheld as valid, as the appellant did not contest them. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing suppression of facts for penalty imposition under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>