https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245745 CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed Revenue's appeal due to a lack of proper authorization, as the authorizations were signed by different Commissioners on separate days without a committee, rendering the appeal non-maintainable. The irregularity in signing authorizations was highlighted, posing a risk to public revenue. The CDR was instructed to inform the board to prevent revenue loss. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245745 CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed Revenue's appeal due to a lack of proper authorization, as the authorizations were signed by different Commissioners on separate days without a committee, rendering the appeal non-maintainable. The irregularity in signing authorizations was highlighted, posing a risk to public revenue. The CDR was instructed to inform the board to prevent revenue loss. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245745