<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 861 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245741</link>
    <description>Steel doors installed in medicine storage premises were held ineligible for CENVAT credit because they had no role in manufacture and did not satisfy the statutory description of inputs. They also could not be treated as capital goods, as they were not equipment or any specified category within the credit scheme. The requirement under Schedule M to the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 for suitable or non-shedding doors in aseptic areas did not convert the doors into pollution control devices. Regulatory compliance with pharmaceutical premises norms was therefore distinct from eligibility for credit, and the denial of CENVAT credit was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 861 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245741</link>
      <description>Steel doors installed in medicine storage premises were held ineligible for CENVAT credit because they had no role in manufacture and did not satisfy the statutory description of inputs. They also could not be treated as capital goods, as they were not equipment or any specified category within the credit scheme. The requirement under Schedule M to the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 for suitable or non-shedding doors in aseptic areas did not convert the doors into pollution control devices. Regulatory compliance with pharmaceutical premises norms was therefore distinct from eligibility for credit, and the denial of CENVAT credit was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>