<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 856 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery as the demand of duty was considered time-barred due to the lack of specific grounds for invoking the extended limitation period. The judgment emphasized the importance of meeting legal criteria for duty liability allegations and upheld the appellant&#039;s plea in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:28:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 856 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery as the demand of duty was considered time-barred due to the lack of specific grounds for invoking the extended limitation period. The judgment emphasized the importance of meeting legal criteria for duty liability allegations and upheld the appellant&#039;s plea in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>