<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 219 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax levy on the amount received for &#039;Goodwill&#039; and the right to use a specific name, considering it falling under &#039;Intellectual Property Services&#039;. It also supported the invocation of the extended limitation period by the Revenue. The Applicant was directed to make a predeposit of 25% of the service tax within six weeks to proceed with the appeal process, with the balance dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 219 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax levy on the amount received for &#039;Goodwill&#039; and the right to use a specific name, considering it falling under &#039;Intellectual Property Services&#039;. It also supported the invocation of the extended limitation period by the Revenue. The Applicant was directed to make a predeposit of 25% of the service tax within six weeks to proceed with the appeal process, with the balance dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>