<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 202 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance on account of higher rate of depreciation claimed on civil work for foundation, electrical equipment, and evacuation charges related to the windmill. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the disallowance of service tax expenses pertaining to earlier years. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the decisions of the CIT(A) on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 202 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance on account of higher rate of depreciation claimed on civil work for foundation, electrical equipment, and evacuation charges related to the windmill. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the disallowance of service tax expenses pertaining to earlier years. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the decisions of the CIT(A) on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>