https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245696 The Kerala High Court declined to interfere with the confirmed allotment of toddy shops because the petitioners' objection and representation were still pending before the competent authority. The Court noted the petitioners' claim of joint entitlement and their request for time to satisfy auction conditions, but, without expressing any view on the merits, left the dispute to be decided by the statutory authority. It directed that the representation be considered after notice to the affected party and that orders be passed expeditiously. The writ petition was thus not used to disturb the confirmed allotment at that stage. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Apr 2014 13:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245696 The Kerala High Court declined to interfere with the confirmed allotment of toddy shops because the petitioners' objection and representation were still pending before the competent authority. The Court noted the petitioners' claim of joint entitlement and their request for time to satisfy auction conditions, but, without expressing any view on the merits, left the dispute to be decided by the statutory authority. It directed that the representation be considered after notice to the affected party and that orders be passed expeditiously. The writ petition was thus not used to disturb the confirmed allotment at that stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245696