<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 826 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163576</link>
    <description>Appellate authorities in a tax appeal may consider additional documents first produced in appeal where the materials relate to third-party transactions, are not shown to be false or inadmissible, and the statutory bar on first receipt of records is aimed at dealer accounts used to recast assessment defects. The restriction in section 39B of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 did not apply on these facts, and the Tribunal could also call for fresh evidence under its regulations for proper adjudication. The appellate order was therefore not vitiated by admission of the documents, and the challenge on that ground failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 826 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163576</link>
      <description>Appellate authorities in a tax appeal may consider additional documents first produced in appeal where the materials relate to third-party transactions, are not shown to be false or inadmissible, and the statutory bar on first receipt of records is aimed at dealer accounts used to recast assessment defects. The restriction in section 39B of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 did not apply on these facts, and the Tribunal could also call for fresh evidence under its regulations for proper adjudication. The appellate order was therefore not vitiated by admission of the documents, and the challenge on that ground failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>