<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 873 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163560</link>
    <description>Purchase tax on raw bones bought from unregistered dealers does not arise where conversion into crushed bones, bone meal, bone sinews, horns and hooves does not amount to consumption in manufacture. The Supreme Court-approved reasoning treats raw bones as not consumed and the resulting processing as not constituting manufacture for this purpose; consequently, the earlier contrary High Court view cannot govern. A concession made before the Tribunal on a point of law does not bind the assessee or prevent reliance on a later Supreme Court ruling that changes the applicable legal position. The tax demand on the disputed raw-bone purchases was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 873 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163560</link>
      <description>Purchase tax on raw bones bought from unregistered dealers does not arise where conversion into crushed bones, bone meal, bone sinews, horns and hooves does not amount to consumption in manufacture. The Supreme Court-approved reasoning treats raw bones as not consumed and the resulting processing as not constituting manufacture for this purpose; consequently, the earlier contrary High Court view cannot govern. A concession made before the Tribunal on a point of law does not bind the assessee or prevent reliance on a later Supreme Court ruling that changes the applicable legal position. The tax demand on the disputed raw-bone purchases was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>