<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 685 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163542</link>
    <description>Cable television shown in hospital rooms and common areas was held to fall within the statutory meaning of &quot;entertainment&quot; because the facility was provided as part of paid accommodation and the charges for graded rooms indirectly covered the amenity, even without a separate television fee. The hospital trust was also treated as a &quot;proprietor&quot; because it provided, managed, and led the television facility as part of the hospital services. On that reasoning, entertainment duty was sustained and the writ challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 685 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163542</link>
      <description>Cable television shown in hospital rooms and common areas was held to fall within the statutory meaning of &quot;entertainment&quot; because the facility was provided as part of paid accommodation and the charges for graded rooms indirectly covered the amenity, even without a separate television fee. The hospital trust was also treated as a &quot;proprietor&quot; because it provided, managed, and led the television facility as part of the hospital services. On that reasoning, entertainment duty was sustained and the writ challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>