<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dispute Over Including Unexplained Expenditures u/s 69C Within Section 142A&#039;s Scope, Lacks Legislative Clarity.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18045</link>
    <description>Addition made u/s 69C – Reference made to DVO u/s 142A - If the intention of the Legislature to include unexplained expenditure as contemplated in Sec.69C of the provision of Sec.142A should have been specifically mentioning the same - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:24:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dispute Over Including Unexplained Expenditures u/s 69C Within Section 142A&#039;s Scope, Lacks Legislative Clarity.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18045</link>
      <description>Addition made u/s 69C – Reference made to DVO u/s 142A - If the intention of the Legislature to include unexplained expenditure as contemplated in Sec.69C of the provision of Sec.142A should have been specifically mentioning the same - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:24:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>