<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 175 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245677</link>
    <description>The Court noted the appellant&#039;s payment of Rs. 88,18,811 towards service tax liability and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh hearing and disposal of the appeal (Appeal No. ST/219/2009). The appellant had initially remitted Rs. 44,51,646 in protest, later supplementing it to cover the full liability. With no objection from the respondent, the Court ordered the remand, ultimately disposing of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 175 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245677</link>
      <description>The Court noted the appellant&#039;s payment of Rs. 88,18,811 towards service tax liability and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh hearing and disposal of the appeal (Appeal No. ST/219/2009). The appellant had initially remitted Rs. 44,51,646 in protest, later supplementing it to cover the full liability. With no objection from the respondent, the Court ordered the remand, ultimately disposing of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>