<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 163 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the marked to market losses on foreign exchange contracts, citing the deductibility of unrealized losses due to foreign exchange fluctuations as expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal dismissed the claim for the write-off of the non-compete fee, following judicial precedence and previous decisions against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:40:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 163 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the marked to market losses on foreign exchange contracts, citing the deductibility of unrealized losses due to foreign exchange fluctuations as expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal dismissed the claim for the write-off of the non-compete fee, following judicial precedence and previous decisions against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>